03/17 PERSONALquarterly
45
LITERATURVERZEICHNIS
Aldana, S. G. (2001): Financial Impact of Health Promotion Programs: A Comprehen-
sive Review of the Literature. American Journal of Health Promotion, 15(5), 296–320.
Baicker, K./Cutler, D./Song, Z. (2010). Workplace wellness programs can gene-
rate savings. Health affairs, 29(2), 304-311.
Bundesrechnungshof (2017): Bemerkungen Band II Nr. 03 - Bundeswehr nimmt
Arbeitszeitausfall von mehreren tausend Stellen durch Gesundheitskurse hin.
bruf 01.05.2017)
Cascio, W./Boudreau, J. (2010). Investing in people: Financial impact of human
resource initiatives. Ft Press.
Conn, V. S./Hafdahl, A. R./Cooper, P. S./Brown, L. M./Lusk, S. L. (2009): Meta-
analysis of workplace physical activity interventions. American Journal of Preventive
Medicine, 37(4), 330–339.
Cox, T./Griffiths, A. J./Rial-Gonzalez, E. (2000): Research on Work-related Stress.
Report to the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. Luxembourg: Office
for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Darr, W./Johns, G. (2008): Work strain, health, and absenteeism: A meta-analysis.
Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 13(4), 293–318.
Falkenberg, A./Nyfjall, M./Hellgren, C./Vingard, E. (2012): Social support
at work and leisure time and its association with self-rated health and sickness
absence. Work, 43(4), 469-474.
Goetzel, R. Z./Ozminkowski, R. J. (2008): The health and cost benefits of work
site health-promotion programs. Annual Review of Public Health, 29, 303–23.
Haveraaen, L. A./Skarpaas, L. S./Berg, J. E./Aas, R. W. (2016): Do psychologi-
cal job demands, decision control and social support predict return to work three
months after a return-to-work (RTW) programme? The rapid-RTW cohort study.
Work, 53(1), 61.
Jackson, S. E./Schuler, R. S. (1985): A meta-analysis and conceptual critique of
research on role ambiguity and role conflict in work settings. Organizational Behavi-
or and Human Decision Processes, 36, 16–78.
Joiko, K./Schmauder, M./Wolff, G. (2010): Psychische Belastung und Beanspru-
chung im Berufsleben. Dortmund: BAuA.
LaMontagne, A. D./Keegel, T./Louie, A. M./Ostry, A./Landsbergis, P. A. (2007):
A systematic review of the job-stress intervention evaluation literature, 1990-2005.
International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health, 13, 268–280.
Latham, G. P./Whyte, G. (1994). The futility of utility analysis. Personnel Psycho-
logy, 47(1), 31-46.
Lee, R. T./Ashforth, B. E. (1996): A meta-analytic examination of the correlates of
the three dimensions of job burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(2), 123–33.
Marchand, A./Blanc, M. E. (2011): Occupation, work organisation conditions and
the development of chronic psychological distress. Work, 40(4), 425-435.
Meyer, J. P./Stanley, D. J./Herscovitch, L./Topolnytsky, L. (2002): Affective,
continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of an-
tecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(1), 20–52.
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (1999): Stress ... at work.
DHHS, Publication No. 99-101. Cincinnati, OH: National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health.
Podsakoff, N. P./LePine, J. A./LePine, M. A. (2007): Differential challenge
stressor-hindrance stressor relationships with job attitudes, turnover intentions,
turnover, and withdrawal behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology,
92(2), 438–54.
Stansfeld, S./Candy, B. (2006): Psychosocial work environment and mental
health – a meta-analytic review. Scandinavian journal of work, environment &
health, 32(6), 443-462.
Techniker Krankenkasse (2013): Bleib locker, Deutschland! Hamburg: TK-Pressestelle.
DR. ARMITA ATABAKI
Human Resources BASF SE
E-Mail:
PROF. DR. THOMAS OLBRECHT
FOM Hochschule für Oekonomie und
Management Hochschulstudienzentrum Bonn
und EuPD Research
E-Mail:
PROF. DR. HEIKO WECKMÜLLER
FOM Hochschule für Oekonomie und
Management
Hochschulstudienzentrum Bonn
E-Mail:
darum geht, ehemals langfristig erkrankte Personen erfolg-
reich zurück in den Arbeitsalltag zu integrieren.
3
Auf Basis des Forschungsstands ist davon auszugehen, dass
der ROI von BGM-Maßnahmen positiv ist. Allerdings sind ver-
einfachende Business-Case-Betrachtungen eher kontraproduk-
tiv. Unternehmensspezifische Analysen können die Akzeptanz
erhöhen.
