Seite 49 - PERSONALquarterly_2014_03

Basic HTML-Version

03 / 14 personalquarterly
49
Prof. Dr. Torsten Biemann
Universität Mannheim
Lehrstuhl für Personalmanagement
und Führung
E-Mail:
Literaturverzeichnis
Ayman, R./Korabik, K./Morris, S. (2009): Is Transformational Leadership Always
Perceived as Effective? Male Subordinates‘ Devaluation of Female Transformational
Leaders. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39(4), 852-879.
Biemann, T./Weckmüller, H. (2012): Wie man erfolgreiche Teams zusammen-
stellt, Personalquarterly, 65(3), S. 46-49.
Bigelow, L./Lundmark, L./Parks, J. M./Wuebker, R. (2012): Skirting the Issues:
Experimental Evidence of Gender Bias in IPO Prospectus Evaluations. Journal of
Management, online.
Bowles, H. R./McGinn, K. (2005): Claiming authority: Negotiating challenges for
women leaders. In Messick, D. M./Kramer, R. (Eds.), The Psychology of Leadership:
Some New Approaches, 191-208. Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum.
Byrnes, J. P./Miller, D. C./Schafer, W. D. (1999): Gender differences in risk taking:
A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125(3), 367-383.
Eagly, A. H./Carli, L. L. (2007): Through the labyrinth: The truth about how
women become leaders. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Eagly, A. H./Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C./Van Engen, M. L. (2003): Transforma-
tional, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: a meta-analysis comparing
women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129(4): 569-591.
Eagly, A. H./Karau, S. J. (2002): Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female
leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573-598.
Eagly, A. H./Karau, S. J./Makhijani, M. G. (1995): Gender and the effectiveness
of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 125-145
Eagly, A. H./Makhijani, M. G./Klonsky, B. G. (1992): Gender and the evaluation
of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111(1), 3–22.
van Engen, M. L./Willemsen, T. M. (2004): Sex and leadership styles: A Meta-
analysis of Research Published in the 1990s. Psychological Reports 94, 3-18.
Feingold, A. (1994): Gender differences in personality: a meta-analysis. Psycholo-
gical Bulletin, 116(3), 429-456.
Franke, G. R./Crown, D. F./Spake, D. F. (1997): Gender differences in ethical per-
ceptions of business practices: a social role theory perspective. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 82(6), 920-934.
Heilman, M. E. (2001): Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes
prevent women‘s ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues,
57(4), 657-674.
Hoyt, C. L./Blascovich, J. (2010): The role of leadership self-efficacy and ste-
reotype activation on cardiovascular, behavioral and self-report responses in the
leadership domain. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(1), 89-103.
Judge, T. A./Piccolo, R. F. (2004): Transformational and transactional leadership:
a meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5),
755.
Kark, R./Waismel-Manor, R./Shamir, B. (2012): Does valuing androgyny and
femininity lead to a female advantage? The relationship between gender-role,
transformational leadership and identification. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(3),
620-640.
Statistische Ämter des Bundes und der Länder (2012): Bildung in Deutschland
2012.
3.04.2014]
Steinpreis, R.E./Anders, K.A./Ritzke, D. (1999): The impact of gender on the
review of the curricula vitae of job applicants and tenure candidates: A national
empirical study. Sex Roles, 41(7/8), 509-528.
Williams, J. (2010): Reshaping the working-family debate: Why men and class
matter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Prof. Dr. Heiko Weckmüller
FOM Hochschule für Oekonomie und
Management, Hochschulstudien-
zentrum Bonn
E-Mail:
Irmela Koch, Dipl.-KffR.
Doktorandin und wissenschaftliche Mitarbei-
terin, Universität Mannheim, Lehrstuhl für
Personalmanagement und Führung
E-Mail: