PERSONALquarterly 3/2020

29 03/20 PERSONALquarterly PROF. DR. SABINE SONNENTAG Lehrstuhl für Arbeits- und Organisations­ psychologie Universität Mannheim E-Mail: sonnentag@uni-mannheim.de www.uni-mannheim.de LITERATURVERZEICHNIS Binnewies, C./Sonnentag, S./Mojza, E. J. (2010): Recovery during the weekend and fluctuations in weekly job performance: A four-week longitudinal study examining intra-individual relationships. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 419-441. doi:10.1348/096317909X418049 Chawla, N./MacGowan, R. L./Gabriel, A. S./Podsakoff, N. P. (2020): Unplug- ging or staying connected? Examining the nature, antecedents, and consequences of profiles of daily recovery experiences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105, 19-39. doi:10.1037/apl0000423 Christian, M. S./Garza, A. S./Slaughter, J. E. (2011): Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64, 89-136. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01203.x Crawford, E. R./LePine, J. A./Rich, B. L. (2010): Linking job demands and re- sources to employee engagement and burnout: A theoretical extension and meta- analytic test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 834-848. doi:10.1037/a0019364 Culbertson, S. S./Mills, M. J./Fullagar, C. J. (2012): Work engagement and work-family facilitation: Making homes happier through positive affective spillover. Human Relations, 65, 1155-1177. doi:10.1177/0018726712440295 Fritz, C./Yankelevich, M./Zarubin, A./Barger, P. (2010): Happy, healthy and productive: The role of detachment from work during nonwork time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 977-983. doi:10.1037/a0019462 Garrick, A./Mak, A. S./Cathcart, S./Winwood, P. C./Bakker, A. B./Lushing- ton, K. (2014): Psychosocial safety climate moderating the effects of daily job demands and recovery on fatigue and work engagement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87, 694-714. doi:10.1111/joop.12069 Kahn, W. A. (1990): Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 692-724. doi:10.2307/256287 Kinnunen, U./Feldt, T. (2013): Job characteristics, recovery experiences and occupational well-being: Testing cross-lagged relationships across 1 year. Stress and Health, 29, 369-382. doi:10.1002/smi.2483 Koch, A. R./Binnewies, C. (2015): Setting a good example: Supervisors as work- life friendly role models within the context of boundary management. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 20, 82-92. doi:10.1037/a0037890 Lanaj, K./Johnson, R. E./Barnes, C. M. (2014): Beginning the workday yet already depleted? Consequences of late-night smartphone use and sleep. Orga- nizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 124, 11-23. doi:10.1016/j. obhdp.2014.01.001 McGrath, E./Cooper-Thomas, H. D./Garrosa, E./Sanz-Vergel, A. I./Cheung, G. W. (2017): Rested, friendly, and engaged: The role of daily positive collegial interactions at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38, 1213-1226. doi:10.1002/job.2197 Niks, I. M. W./Gevers, J. M. P./De Jonge, J./Houtman, I. L. D. (2016): The relation between off-job recovery and job resources: person-level differences and day-level dynamics. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25, 226-238. doi:10.1080/1359432x.2015.1042459 Ouyang, K./Cheng, B. H./Lam, W./Parker, S. K. (2019): Enjoy your evening, be proactive tomorrow: How off-job experiences shape daily proactivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104, 1003-1019. doi:10.1037/apl0000391 Park, Y./Haun, V. C. (2017): Dual-earner couples’ weekend recovery support, state of recovery, and work engagement: Work-linked relationship as a moderator. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22, 455-466. doi:10.1037/ocp0000045 Schaufeli, W. B/Bakker, A. B. (2004): Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi-sample study. Journal of Orga- nizational Behavior, 25, 293-315. doi:10.1002/job.248 Schlachter, S./McDowall, A./Cropley, M./Inceoglu, I. (2018): Voluntary work- related technology use during non-work time: A narrative synthesis of empirical research and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20, 825-846. doi:10.1111/ijmr.12165 Sonnentag, S. (2003): Recovery, work engagement, and proactive behavior: A new look at the interface between non-work and work. Journal of Applied Psycho- logy, 88, 518-528. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.518 Sonnentag, S. (2018): The recovery paradox: Portraying the complex interplay between job stressors, lack of recovery, and poor well-being. Research in Organiza- tional Behavior, 38, 169-185. doi:10.1016/j.riob.2018.11.002 Sonnentag, S./Binnewies, C./Mojza, E. J. (2010): Staying well and engaged when demands are high: The role of psychological detachment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 965-976. doi:10.1037/a0020032 Sonnentag, S./Eck, K./Fritz, C./Kühnel, J. (in press): Morning reattachment to work and work engagement during the day: A look at day-level mediators. Journal of Management. doi:10.1177/0149206319829823 Sonnentag, S./Kühnel, J. (2016): Coming back to work in the morning: Psycholo- gical detachment and reattachment as predictors of work engagement. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 21, 379-390. doi:10.1037/ocp0000020 Sonnentag, S./Mojza, E. J./Demerouti, E./Bakker, A. B. (2012): Reciprocal relations between recovery and work engagement: The moderating role of job stressors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 842-853. doi:10.1037/a0028292 Steed, L. B./Swider, B. W./Keem, S./Liu, J. T. (2019): Leaving work at work: A meta-analysis on employee recovery from work. Journal of Management, 0149206319864153. doi:10.1177/0149206319864153 ten Brummelhuis, L. L./Bakker, A. B. (2012): Staying engaged during the week: The effect of off-job activities on next day work engagement. Journal of Occupatio- nal Health Psychology, 17, 445-455. doi:10.1037/a0029213 SUMMARY Research question: This article addresses the question how leisure- time recovery processes are related to engagement at work. Methodology: Literature review comprising empirical studies using various research designs. Practical implications: Both recovery and reattachment to work are important practical pathways to work engagement.